Thursday, February 28, 2013
Arguments Against Organic Foods ------- Katie Anderson
With my topic of my research analysis focusing
on the pros to eating organically grown foods and trying to be more aware of
what we are putting into our bodies, the big question that arises from many is
the price difference between eating organic produce or just eating healthy
verses eating conventionally grown foods.
It is evident that organically grown foods do cost more than
conventionally grown foods and this is because of the production process. Many
argue that it is not worth the extra cents or sometimes dollars that it costs
in order to buy organic food over conventionally grown foods. In 2010, the Mother Nature Network, which is
a health foods network, states that organic carrots were thirty-nine percent
more than conventionally grown carrots and organic eggs were one hundred and
fifteen percent more than conventionally grown eggs. So with this said, the price difference can
vary greatly. This is because the products and the production
is more expensive when you’re growing organic foods as compared to conventional
foods. Some
health conscious consumers choose to pay 40 to 120 percent more for organic
foods and products while the general population still prefers to save their
money and take their chances. Others
may also argue that there is a chance that soil from conventionally grown foods
may run off into organic farms which will then contaminate the organic foods
and this will lead people to argue that they should not buy organic foods. The chances of this are very slim and there
is really not much that organic farmers can do about this. One way to prevent this is through the
farming technique of cover crops. This
is the use of having extremely strong roots for the crops in order to avoid
soil runoff. With all of this said,
there are many arguments that society will bring up against organic farming,
but there is than having a couple extra dollars in my pocket.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment